NeuroMyths in Education Article: The Neuroscience Literacy of Trainee Teachers

Article Abstract:

Background: There is concern about the prevalence of neuromyths in education, but
little is known about how teachers think about the brain and how this may influence
their practice.
Aim: To further understanding of how teachers, at entry to the profession, think about
brain development and function.
Sample: 158 graduate trainee teachers at the end of their one-year course.
Methods: Preliminary semi-structured interviews contributed to the development of a
suitable survey instrument. Participants were then surveyed during one of their final
lectures.
Results: Trainees‟ ideas reflected misconceptions in public circulation and notions
promoted by popular brain-based educational programmes. Most of the trainee
teachers in our survey did not accept, or were unsure, about whether mental activity
derives from biological brain function. Trainee teachers place equal importance on
home environment and education as determinants of educational outcome, with
genetics a significant but smaller influence than either. A follow up survey with a new
cohort of trainees confirmed that constructs about development are linked to a sense
of agency, with beliefs in strong genetic influence associated with stronger notions of
biologically-defined limits on pupil achievement.
Conclusions: In the absence of formal training, trainee teachers acquire their own
ideas about brain function, many of which are potentially detrimental to their practice
as teachers.

LINK:  The Neuroscience Literacy of Trainee  Teachers 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s